(for-uhm nahn cahn-vee-nee-ehns) n. Latin for a forum that is not practical. This doctrine applies when the court chosen by the plaintiff (plaintiff) is inconvenient to witnesses or undue hardship to defendants, who must apply to the court for an order to refer the case to a more appropriate court. A typical example is a trial arising from an accident involving a resident outside the State filing the claim in his or her home state (or in the defendant driver`s home state) when the witnesses and doctors who treated the plaintiff are in the state where the accident occurred. This makes this state the most appropriate place for the trial. Forum shopping is frowned upon in the courts. Many federal and state procedural rules, as well as federal and state laws, discourage this practice by limiting a plaintiff`s choice of location to locations that are convenient for both parties. The Uniform Custody Jurisdiction Act, for example, limits the exercise of jurisdiction over custody orders to the child`s State of origin. Asian Law, `Forum` (legaldictionary.lawin.org 2021) join 2022 on October 11 She might be interested in the historical significance of this term. Browse or search for a forum on historical law in the Encyclopedia of Law. Prior to the legal development of due process, state governments had the power to regulate speech in public places without regard to the First Amendment. In the Massachusetts Supreme Court case of 1895, Massachusetts v. Davis, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote, “It is no more a violation of a citizen`s right to prohibit public speaking on a highway or public park, absolutely or conditionally, than it is for the owner of a private house to prohibit it in his home.” The Supreme Court unanimously upheld Holmes` opinion in the 1897 appeal of Davis v.

Massachusetts. Regardless of the type of forum, any exclusion must be neutral from the point of view. An exclusion based on the speaker`s point of view is unconstitutional. Simple and easy-to-use free online guide to legal terms. The legal dictionary is a comprehensive source of meanings and synonyms for more than 5,000 of the most common legal terms. More than 47,000 legal and related terms and definitions on all aspects of law, taxation, public administration and political science. Continuous updates as new terms and definitions are released. Definitions supported by research published in more than 130 countries.

Public forums are described in two types: traditional and designated. A traditional public forum is where speech/expression is supported by the First Amendment and when the government`s ability to regulate speech is curtailed, such as a sidewalk or state park. While a designated public forum is “intended to be used by the public as a venue for expressive activities,” such as social media. An open forum created by the government can be excluded from expression as long as there is no retaliation or willingness to reduce certain narratives. Just as Donald Trump blocked a group of Twitter users from his account on the platform, the court considered his tweets and comments a public forum, so you can`t violate a person`s right in this environment, as social media is just a virtual form of communication/expression. A public forum, for example, applies only to the protection of political speech. [1] In the federal court system and in many states, laws have been enacted that allow one court to transfer a case to another court operating in the same system or state in which the case could have been filed in the first place. Thus, the court seised must also have jurisdiction to hear the case. Unlike the forum non conveniens request, a transfer request can be made by both parties and does not require the action to be dismissed and then resubmitted to the new court.

In addition, to obtain a transfer, the applicant must demonstrate a lower degree of inconvenience than is necessary before a court grants a forum non conveniens request. For example, federal law provides that a case may be transferred from one federal court to another “for convenience of parties and witnesses” and “in the interests of justice” (28 U.S.C.A. § 1404(a) (West Supp. 1995)). However, because transfers are limited to courts of the same system or state, a defendant who wishes to move from a federal court to a state court or court in another country, or from a state court in one state to a state court in another state, must nevertheless file a motion to dismiss the claim on the basis of the forum non conveniens. In U.S. constitutional law, a forum is property open to public expression and assembly. Many legal terms are subject to interpretation. This law dictionary identifies general definitions of terms found on the websites of the Encyclopedia of Law. It defines common acronyms and contains links to information on important legislation and related legal terms. This legal encyclopedia is updated as new terminologies emerge in this area, new laws are enacted, and legal terms take on a new meaning.

(2021, 02). Forum legaldictionary.lawin.org (accessed January 10, 2022) of legaldictionary.lawin.org/forum/ 02, 2021. 10 2022 A competent court may refuse to exercise it if the parties and the interests of justice would benefit from hearing the claim by another court also competent in the matter.