I write about how I think the drinking age should be lowered to 18. I feel like I`m having a bit of trouble with my intro. Lowering the drinking age would reduce the teen crime rate and prevent billions of dollars from being lost each year. A high drinking age has proven ineffective in preventing alcohol-induced crime, and lowering it can promote the overall well-being of our society. The legal drinking age in most countries is 18 and it`s probably time for the U.S. to change its MLDA forever. You can order an original essay written according to your instructions. The reduction in legal alcohol consumption has led to an increase in school dropout rates in the past. Lowering the drinking age increases the number of students who are addicted to drugs and also encourages many students to drop out of school. The reduction in the drinking age to 18 in the 1970s – the 80s led to an increase in the high school dropout rate – in particular, the rate rose from 4% to 13%.

Many fear that the same thing could happen again if we decide to lower the legal drinking age. Some good points here, we have already discussed. One thing you might mention is the health risks associated with alcohol consumption. I think this is an important point when raising the age to 21, some argue that the brain is not fully developed by 18. something to consider. For your introduction, to make it a little more appealing, talk about your experience in the drinking culture in England/Europe and compare it to the drinking culture of young Americans. You can mention Penn State, but again, it depends on who you`re writing to. Right now, I don`t think talking about Penn State will add or distract your newspaper, but if you`re focusing on a specific audience (e.g., Penn State administrators), some PSU stats might be beneficial. www.apa.org/monitor/jan08/earlydrinking.aspx A higher legal drinking age is responsible for a large number of people breaking the law and has also contributed to the prosperity of the black market. Alcoholic beverages are common at most high school parties and when legal alcohol consumption is high, teens are tricked into breaking laws in order to maintain them. Breaking the law once and getting away with it encourages them to break other laws in the future. When alcohol is sold illegally, the profit from the sale goes to criminals, which indirectly encourages more crime.

Secondly, lowering the age limit would reduce the hazardous activities that follow underage drinking. Since young adults are not allowed to drink in public, this leads to very dangerous and unsupervised drinking activities. Instead of being in a situation that would protect new drinkers and have people who know the signs of bad drinking habits like excessive drinking and other dangerous practices. They are forced to find themselves in situations without supervision and without the possibility of harming themselves or others. This bill has had its fair share of opposition, and the key to its opponents is the Conservative Party, which opposed the passage of the bill when it was first discussed in Congress. Since then, the party no longer considers it important to lower the drinking age to eighteen. Another opposition came from New York State Assembly member Felix Ortiz, who introduced a bill to lower the legal drinking age from twenty-one to eighteen. He noted that the law was unjust and that its application was very difficult (Eigen, p. 232). Lowering the drinking age raises the idea of how adulthood is defined in this country.

The age of majority, as defined by law, is the age at which a person is legally recognized as an adult and is fully responsible for his or her actions. All states except Mississippi have set the age of majority at 18 (some states have a majority age of 19, while Mississippi is 21). contests.about.com/od/sweepstakes101/a/agemajoristate.htm When you are of legal age (usually 18), you can legally vote, serve on jurors, get married, sign binding contracts, and join the military. All these situations involve full responsibility towards adults. Eighteen-year-olds are trusted to take on some of our country`s greatest responsibilities – they elect our political leaders, can form matrimonial unions that form the foundation of our country, and even defend our country on the battlefield. Eighteen-year-olds are basically allowed to take up life and death positions, but they are not even allowed to buy an alcoholic beverage if they want to. If eighteen-year-olds are given the above tasks, they should have the right to legally consume alcoholic beverages if they so wish. Lowering the drinking age to eighteen does not necessarily mean that all eighteen-year-olds will drink. However, it will give them the right they deserve to decide whether or not to drink while they have the right to make other adult decisions and take on other adult responsibilities. Also, as already mentioned, alcohol consumption should be a pleasurable activity.

Eighteen-year-olds have the opportunity to engage in other enjoyable activities, such as buying lottery tickets or gambling, if practiced in moderation, so they should at least have the opportunity to participate in the enjoyable activity of drinking. When asked at a random gathering of students why they thought the drinking age should be lowered, it was the most popular answer. Here`s an argumentative essay on both: Why the drinking age should be lowered and why the drinking age shouldn`t be lowered. A specific way to strengthen the paragraph on the link between underage drinking and the increase in the number of accidents related to drunk driving would be to find statistics on drunk driving among 18-20 year olds in countries where the minimum drinking age is lower. Your newspaper`s audience seemed to be a legislature/town hall meeting, so mentioning Penn State wouldn`t improve the paper. If you want to limit the audience to Penn State students/faculty, it would be beneficial to bring more specific examples. The initiative argues that they have experienced first-hand the problems that students face with alcohol and say the law does not seem to be working. They call on lawmakers to reconsider the law and not hesitate to include other guidelines such as education about the dangers associated with alcohol. They say the best way to tackle the alcohol problem is to implement policies that ensure that minors are educated about the dangers of binge drinking, which are prevalent in colleges in the United States (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, p.

256). This law was enacted in the United States in July 1984 and was seen as a mechanism that would serve as a basis for all states to limit the age of access to alcohol to twenty-one years. Any state that did not comply with this law would be punished by deducting ten percent of the federal government`s annual highway tax. The U.S. Congress did not enact this law to make it a criminal offense for those under twenty, but many states have completely banned underage drinking and enacted a provision that the legal drinking age is twenty-one and older. But there are still states that allow the consumption of alcohol by minors, provided that it is done in private or with the consent and presence of an adult or adult family member, or as part of various religious celebrations (Hanson, p. 85). The illegal sale of alcoholic beverages has resulted in huge economic losses for the government and retailers. A survey conducted by the CDC found that 11% of all alcohol is consumed by the population under the age of 21; Everything is sold without government approval. The resulting profits are not taxed and go to the black market. Hundreds of millions of dollars that could otherwise have been spent on people`s well-being go into the hands of illegal traffickers.

Lowering the legal drinking age could put an end to this problem. The authorities must also be realistic about university life and take into account their position on the age of alcohol consumption and see if these two things are really compatible.